"
Skip to Content
Version 1.1 – Updated August 2021

Cooperative vs. competitive learning

Overview

  • Influence: Cooperative vs. competitive learning
  • Domain: Teaching Strategies
  • Sub-Domain: Instructional strategies
  • Potential to Accelerate Student Achievement: Potential to accelerate
  • Influence Definition: Cooperative learning (in which students work together to solve problems) has been shown to be more effective than competitive learning (in which students independently solve problems) in nearly all cases, although some studies disagree about the relative advantage to cooperative learning programs.

Evidence

  • Number of meta-analyses: 8
  • Number of studies: 1,031
  • Number of students: 17,000
  • Number of effects: 960
  • Effect size: 0.53

Meta-Analyses

Meta-Analyses
Journal Title Author First Author's Country Article Name Year Published Variable Number of Studies Number of Students Number of Effects Effect Size
Psychological Bulletin Johnson, Maruyama, Johnson, Nelson, & Skon USA Effects of Cooperative, Competitive, and Individualistic Goal Structures on Achievement: A Meta-Analysis 1981 Cooperative with intergroup competition 122 0 9 0.56
Review of Educational Research Johnson, Johnson, & Murayama USA Interdependence and interpersonal attraction among heterogeneous and homogeneous individuals: a theoretical formulation and a meta-analysis of the research 1983 Cooperative vs. competition 98 0 83 0.82
Prentice-Hall Johnson & Johnson USA Learning together and alone: Cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning: 1987 Cooperative vs. competition 453 0 36 0.59
Unpublished Thesis Hall USA The effects of cooperative learning on achievement: a meta-analysis 1988 Cooperative with competition 18 0 83 0.28
Review of Educational Research Qin, Johnson, & Johnson USA Cooperative Versus Competitive Efforts and Problem Solving 1995 Cooperative vs. competition 46 0 63 0.55
Report Johnson, Johnson, & Stanne USA Cooperative learning methods: a meta-analysis 2000 Cooperative vs. competition 158 0 66 0.55
Psychological Bulletin Roseth, Johnson & Johnson Promoting early adolescents' achievement and peer relationships: the effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures 2008 Cooperative vs. competition 129 17,000 593 0.46
Unpublished Thesis Hilk USA Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic learning structures on college student achievement and peer relationships: a series of meta-analyses 2013 Cooperative vs. competitive using university students 7 0 27 0.42
TOTAL/AVERAGE 1,031 17,000 960 0.53

Confidence

The Confidence is the average of these four measures, each divided into five approximately equal groups and assigned a value from 1 to 5 based on the following criteria:

  • Number of Meta-analyses
    • 1 = 1
    • 2 = 2–3
    • 3 = 4–6
    • 4 = 7–9
    • 5 = 10+
  • Number of Studies
    • 1 = 1–10
    • 2 = 11–50
    • 3 = 51–200
    • 4 = 201–400
    • 5 = 400+
  • Number of Students
    • 1 = 1–2,500
    • 2 = 2,501–10,000
    • 3 = 10,000–20,000
    • 4 = 20,000–100,000
    • 5 = 100,001+
  • Number of Effects
    • 1 = 1–100
    • 2 = 101–300
    • 3 = 301–600
    • 4 = 601–1,200
    • 5 = 1,200+
Confidences
Number of Meta-Analyses Number of Studies Number of Students Number of Effects Overall Confidence
Confidence Factor 4 5 3 4 4
Back to top